25 Comments
User's avatar
Usually Wash's avatar

I mean, the argument for why you should support Israel over Hamas in my view, is simple:

Hamas is an ISIS-like third-wordlist terrorist organization whose goal is to kill or expel the Jewish population of Israel. They have said this many times.

Israel, by contrast, is a developed democracy with a free press where Arabs have rights. Arabs prefer to live in Israel rather than in a Palestinian state. They removed a brain tumor of the head of Hamas, saving his life. They warned large areas of Gaza to evacuate before attacking them, even at cost to their own troops. Israel has a free economy and a booming tech sector. Israel is a big power in cybersecurity and missile defense, and cooperates with the US on this quite a bit. Major US tech companies are invested in Israel. One eighth of Nvidia’s workforce is there.

There really is no comparison between the two in terms of what kind of society they are trying to create and how much they advance civilization. There also is no comparison in how much each side serves American interests.

That doesn’t mean that everything Israel does is right. Indeed they shut down everything coming into Gaza right after October 7 (because of emotional reasons, an understandable if bad emotional response, not logical reasons), but then after two weeks or so allowed in humanitarian aid again. They hit the WCK people, and then apologized and investigated things. Sure, they make mistakes. Again it's totally legitimate to criticize this or that Israeli action. Just as it's totally legitimate to criticize many of the things the Allies did in WWII or that the Coalition did in fighting ISIS.

Hamas is an extremely evil terrorist organization, on par with the Nazis and ISIS in how evil it is, and needs to be removed from power in Gaza. It has in very clear terms said that its goal is to kill and expel the Jews from Israel, to commit a Second Holocaust. Again this doesn't mean that Israel doesn't make mistakes, just as the coalition make mistakes against ISIS and the Allies made mistakes against Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan.

A ceasefire now just means more destructive wars later. Less deterrence against Hezbollah as well, so it would put people in Southern Lebanon at risk.

Expand full comment
Incel Theory's avatar

"It has in very clear terms said that its goal is to kill and expel the Jews from Israel, to commit a Second Holocaust."

--- And yet Jews move from safe, prosperous countries where they are doing very well to live in the most dangerous place on earth for them. Make it make sense.

Expand full comment
Usually Wash's avatar

Israel is not the most dangerous place on earth for Jews. Hamas has zero chance of ever achieving its goal. Fortunately Hamas is weak. Anyway, Hamas is evil and Israel is right to crush Hamas.

ISIS said in very clear terms that its goal is to create a global Islamic caliphate and kill all non-Muslims. The US is justified in crushing ISIS. Same deal here.

Expand full comment
Incel Theory's avatar

Israel is not the most dangerous place for Jews? There were regular bombings going off in public places for decades.

Expand full comment
Usually Wash's avatar

Death toll pretty low, I'd still be more worried about dying in a car accident, COVID, cancer, diseases, etc. Israel has a high life expectancy. Probably more Jews die prematurely in the US.

Expand full comment
Incel Theory's avatar

Death toll may be low in comparison to the attempts at killing but it's a fearful way to live. Jews need to stay in the safe, prosperous countries they were born in and forget about aliya.

Expand full comment
Usually Wash's avatar

People can do whatever they want.

I have no plans to make aliyah. I have visited Israel before and it’s great. While there I’m more worried about car accidents than terrorists.

Expand full comment
Tamritz's avatar

Somehow, the world is divided in such a way that the people who hate Jews and Israel are always the ones with the worst opinions on many other things. I don't know if any advocate has thought to make this argument, and it's not a classic advocacy argument, and maybe it even stirs up antagonism, but it's the truth.

Expand full comment
Corey Ihler's avatar

The particular community in question often uses the most obscure information that they can find as a way of obscuring the truth. It's a consistent debate tactic that is used from that culture in that community. Obscuring the truth is also known as lying. I think it's mentioned repeatedly in the Bible from the Blessed words of Jesus Christ.

Expand full comment
Usually Wash's avatar

lol

Expand full comment
Black American Dissident's avatar

As well as condemned by Moses and the Prophets ...

Expand full comment
Usually Wash's avatar

The right response to Israel bombing and killing aid workers from the WCK is that it must have been a mistake. Even if you are very cynical (and I’m not; the people running the IDF are very leftist and are pushing for a terrible hostage deal, but that’s a separate topic), Israel has no incentive to do so. Indeed Israel apologized and Netanyahu called it a “tragic incident”. The WCK started operating again in Gaza within a month. Israel dismissed 2 officers over the affair: https://apnews.com/article/israel-world-central-kitchen-gaza-aid-workers-69b6176362dafc8e4e2754b2342faa1d .

See also here: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4569357-netanyahu-responsibility-strik-world-central-kitchen/ and here https://www.axios.com/2024/04/05/israel-strike-wck-cause-investigation-gaza . Every army makes mistakes in wars. The IDF made a mistake, investigated what went wrong, apologized, and disciplined people.

That being said I agree that many of these arguments that you mention are not great arguments.

Expand full comment
Black American Dissident's avatar

They've been killing aid workers and every kind of innocent civilian since before the official founding of their state. it's a quintessentially Zionist activity. You must be new to the history of Zionism.

Expand full comment
Usually Wash's avatar

Do you have any evidence that Israel targeted these WCK workers as a matter of policy?

“The history of Zionism” and the actions of Zionist groups in the 1940s (!) are really not good evidence. You might as well say that if the US killing an aid worker must not be a mistake because we firebombed Dresden in the 1940s, and that killing civilians is a quintessential American activity. We have killed far more than Israel has.

That’s just a ridiculous argument.

Expand full comment
Simon Laird's avatar

Great article.

To be fair though, a few of these are legitimate responses. For example "What would you have them do instead?" and "whataboutism" are always legitimate responses to accusations of misconduct.

Expand full comment
Eugine Nier's avatar

Frankly, all of these are legitimate responses. Note how Diane hasn't actually refuted any of the arguments she's complaining about. In fact, the reason she's complaining about them is that she can't refute them.

Note that the only counter argument she presents is:

> Tell the propagandists “[Logical argument] does not work on me, it only solidifies my position against Israel.”

Expand full comment
Usually Wash's avatar

I think some of them, like accusing the speaker of supporting Hamas for just criticizing some Israeli action, are not good arguments. Neither is saying that the situation in Gaza is the fault of Palestinian civilians. Palestinian civilians have extremist views because of how much propaganda and other awful things there are in their society, but that doesn't make them collectively responsible for Hamas' actions. For the civilians who infiltrated on 10/7 it's their fault. But the average Palestinian should not be blamed for Hamas' actions, even though he is brainwashed to agree with them. There's a good reason Israel tries not to kill the Palestinian civilians if it can help it.

I think that not trusting the numbers from the Gaza Ministry of Health is good though, you should not do that because that is Hamas propaganda, and has proven to be tons of times (e.g. the fake news about the 500 dead in the IDF strike on the hospital, reported by NYT and BBC).

Expand full comment
Diana Tash's avatar

Diane is just a Jew hater saying yeah Jews are smart and I hate them.

Expand full comment
Centex's avatar

I was drawn to this Substack by a separate post on the trans issue which seemed very reasonable and data driven. Then I encounter this piece which seems to completely misrepresent the Israeli predicament in the war between Israel and multiple genocidal Islamist groups. Many of the responses shown to criticism of Israel’s conduct of the war are perfectly reasonable and yet they are described as rote “propaganda” by Ms. Yap. Israel is a democratic country with Western values that is under attack on multiple fronts by well-armed radical Islamist groups that have the stated aim of erasing Israel (and its Jewish inhabitants) from the region. These fanatics are supported by and recruited from local populations a majority of whom have similar views/delusions. The Arab combatants do not wear standard uniforms which would allow them to be differentiated from civilians and, in fact, use civilian deaths as a force multiplier in the realm of public opinion. These terrorists use hospitals, schools, and mosques as military facilities and then scream “atrocity” when Israel attacks these locations and civilians are killed as a result. It seems that Ms. Yap would like to see Israel fight for its very existence with one hand tied behind its back (and maybe wear a blindfold as well) to satisfy some naive sense of “fairness” in these wars. The Israelis, for their part, have already tried playing nice with the Arabs since 1948 and all they have received in return is genocidal rage and unending violence. Time for Israel to try something new (and likely more effective) in the form of overwhelming force. That is, after all, the only thing that the Islamist radicals arrayed against Israel understand.

Expand full comment
Steven's avatar

Just speaking on the ashkenazi IQ part, if I recall the study that was done on it was a little skewed. They did the study using kids who went to a private school vs a public school and the group sizes was something like 20-50 vs several hundred to a thousand at the public side. Not to say they're not intelligent but the tests could be a little misleading

Expand full comment
Wigan's avatar

Diane often seems myopically over-focused on IQ, especially of groups.

Expand full comment
Mike9000's avatar

My smoldering crush on Diane Yap continues to grow with each post.

Expand full comment
Zoltar's Crystal Ball's avatar

That’s funny. My smoldering crush petered out when I realized she is possessed by the same dime-store antisemitism I can find in any gutter.

Expand full comment